Skip to main content

Recent posts

One post tagged with "isolated scope"

View All Tags

My Unrequited Love for Isolate Scope

John Reilly

John Reilly

I wrote a little while ago about creating a directive to present server errors on the screen in an Angular application. In my own (not so humble opinion), it was really quite nice. I was particularly proud of my usage of isolate scope. However, pride comes before a fall.

It turns out that using isolate scope in a directive is not always wise. Or rather – not always possible. And this is why:

Error: [$compile:multidir] Multiple directives [datepickerPopup, serverError] asking for new/isolated scope on: <input name="sage.dateOfBirth" class="col-xs-12 col-sm-9" type="text" value="" ng-click="vm.dateOfBirthDatePickerOpen()" server-error="vm.errors" ng-model="vm.sage.dateOfBirth" is-open="vm.dateOfBirthDatePickerIsOpen" datepicker-popup="dd MMM yyyy"> Ug. What happened here? Well, I had a date field that I was using my serverError directive on. Nothing too controversial there. The problem came when I tried to plug in UI Bootstrap’s datepicker as well. That’s right the directives are fighting. Sad face.

To be more precise, it turns out that only one directive on an element is allowed to create an isolated scope. So if I want to use UI Bootstrap’s datepicker (and I do) – well my serverError directive is toast.

A New Hope#

So ladies and gentlemen, let me present serverError 2.0 – this time without isolated scope:

serverError.ts#

(function () {
"use strict";
var app = angular.module("app");
// Plant a validation message to the right of the element when it is declared invalid by the server
app.directive("serverError", [function () {
// Usage:
// <input class="col-xs-12 col-sm-9"
// name="sage.name" ng-model="vm.sage.name" server-error="vm.errors" />
var directive = {
link: link,
restrict: "A",
require: "ngModel" // supply the ngModel controller as the 4th parameter in the link function
};
return directive;
function link(scope: ng.IScope, element: ng.IAugmentedJQuery, attrs: ng.IAttributes, ngModelController: ng.INgModelController) {
// Extract values from attributes (deliberately not using isolated scope)
var errorKey: string = attrs["name"]; // eg "sage.name"
var errorDictionaryExpression: string = attrs["serverError"]; // eg "vm.errors"
// Bootstrap alert template for error
var template = '<div class="alert alert-danger col-xs-9 col-xs-offset-2" role="alert"><i class="glyphicon glyphicon-warning-sign larger"></i> %error%</div>';
// Create an element to hold the validation message
var decorator = angular.element('<div></div>');
element.after(decorator);
// Watch ngModelController.$error.server & show/hide validation accordingly
scope.$watch(safeWatch(() => ngModelController.$error.server), showHideValidation);
function showHideValidation(serverError: boolean) {
// Display an error if serverError is true otherwise clear the element
var errorHtml = "";
if (serverError) {
var errorDictionary: { [field: string]: string } = scope.$eval(errorDictionaryExpression);
errorHtml = template.replace(/%error%/, errorDictionary[errorKey] || "Unknown error occurred...");
}
decorator.html(errorHtml);
}
// wipe the server error message upon keyup or change events so can revalidate with server
element.on("keyup change", (event) => {
scope.$apply(() => { ngModelController.$setValidity("server", true); });
});
}
}]);
// Thanks @Basarat! http://stackoverflow.com/a/24863256/761388
function safeWatch<T extends Function>(expression: T) {
return () => {
try {
return expression();
}
catch (e) {
return null;
}
};
}
})();

serverError.js#

(function () {
"use strict";
var app = angular.module("app");
// Plant a validation message to the right of the element when it is declared invalid by the server
app.directive("serverError", [function () {
// Usage:
// <input class="col-xs-12 col-sm-9"
// name="sage.name" ng-model="vm.sage.name" server-error="vm.errors" />
var directive = {
link: link,
restrict: "A",
require: "ngModel"
};
return directive;
function link(scope, element, attrs, ngModelController) {
// Extract values from attributes (deliberately not using isolated scope)
var errorKey = attrs["name"];
var errorDictionaryExpression = attrs["serverError"];
// Bootstrap alert template for error
var template = '<div class="alert alert-danger col-xs-9 col-xs-offset-2" role="alert"><i class="glyphicon glyphicon-warning-sign larger"></i> %error%</div>';
// Create an element to hold the validation message
var decorator = angular.element('<div></div>');
element.after(decorator);
// Watch ngModelController.$error.server & show/hide validation accordingly
scope.$watch(safeWatch(function () {
return ngModelController.$error.server;
}), showHideValidation);
function showHideValidation(serverError) {
// Display an error if serverError is true otherwise clear the element
var errorHtml = "";
if (serverError) {
var errorDictionary = scope.$eval(errorDictionaryExpression);
errorHtml = template.replace(/%error%/, errorDictionary[errorKey] || "Unknown error occurred...");
}
decorator.html(errorHtml);
}
// wipe the server error message upon keyup or change events so can revalidate with server
element.on("keyup change", function (event) {
scope.$apply(function () {
ngModelController.$setValidity("server", true);
});
});
}
}]);
// Thanks @Basarat! http://stackoverflow.com/a/24863256/761388
function safeWatch(expression) {
return function () {
try {
return expression();
} catch (e) {
return null;
}
};
}
})();

This version of the serverError directive is from a users perspective identical to the previous version. But it doesn’t use isolated scope – this means it can be used in concert with other directives which do.

It works by pulling the name and serverError values off the attrs parameter. name is just a string - the value of which never changes so it can be used as is. serverError is an expression that represents the error dictionary that is used to store the server error messages. This is accessed through use of scope.$eval as an when it needs to.

My Plea#

What I’ve outlined here works. I’ll admit that usage of $eval makes me feel a little bit dirty (I’ve got “eval is evil” running through my head). Whilst it works, I’m not sure what I’ve done is necessarily best practice. After all the Angular docs themselves say:

*Best Practice: Use the scope option to create isolate scopes when making components that you want to reuse throughout your app. *

But as we’ve seen this isn’t always an option. I’ve written this post to document my own particular struggle and ask the question “is there a better way?” If you know then please tell me!